COMPARISON OF TAILORED AND EMPIRIC SCAN DELAYS FOR CT ANGIOGRAPHY OF THE ABDOMEN

OBJECTIVE. Scan delays for CT angiography of the abdomen are currently individualized by matching a scan delay to the transit time of a test bolus of IV contrast material to the abdominal aorta. We sought to de termine whether this procedure improves the extent and uniformity of a ortic enhancement when compared with the use of a standard scan delay that is determined empirically. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. CT angiography o f the upper abdomen (either the entire abdominal aorta or the aorta sp anning the length of both kidneys for dedicated renal studies) was obt ained in 48 patients who were considered to have normal cardiac functi on as determined by their referring physicians. Patients were randomiz ed to undergo CT angiography that used either a standard scan delay of 20 or 22 sec (group 1, n = 26) or a tailored scan delay (group 2, n = 22), all other imaging parameters being identical. Tailored delays we re determined by measuring contrast transit time to the abdominal aort a with software from the SmartPrep system. For each patient, aortic at tenuation was measured at three different anatomic levels, and a lower threshold of 160 H was considered optimal. The number of attenuation values above this threshold, the mean attenuation, and the attenuation changes for each unit length along the abdominal aorta were then comp ared for the two groups of patients. RESULTS. Fifty-eight (74%) of 78 aortic attenuation values in group 1 and 55 (80%) of 69 in group 2 wer e above 160 H. Mean attenuation values were 192.2 H +/- 8.1 (+/- SE) i n group 1 and 199.2 H +/- 10.1 in group 2. These values and the attenu ation changes for each unit length along the abdominal aorta-3.7 H/cm +/- 1.7 for group 1 and 2.2 H/cm +/- 2.0 for group 2-were not signific antly different. CONCLUSION. Tailoring the scan delay for CT angiograp hy of the abdomen in patients considered to have normal cardiac functi on requires additional IV contrast agent, time, and patient imaging an d does not improve the extent or uniformity of aortic enhancement over that obtained with a standard, empiric scan delay.