Hk. Ha et al., CT DIFFERENTIATION OF TUBERCULOUS PERITONITIS AND PERITONEAL CARCINOMATOSIS, American journal of roentgenology, 167(3), 1996, pp. 743-748
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the potential of
CT for distinguishing tuberculous peritonitis from peritoneal carcino
matosis in 135 clinically or pathologically proven cases. MATERIALS AN
D METHODS. Abdominal CT scans in 135 patients of tuberculous peritonit
is (n = 42) and peritoneal carcinomatosis (n = 93) with documented ome
ntal, mesenteric, or peritoneal pathology were retrospectively reviewe
d. CT findings were evaluated in each group of patients for the morpho
logic appearance of mesenteric or omental abnormalities as well as for
visualization of the spleen and liver, the lymph nodes, and ascites.
Statistical comparisons using multivariate logistic regression analysi
s were performed to adjust for the differences in CT findings between
the two groups. RESULTS. Mesenteric changes were more commonly seen in
patients with tuberculous peritonitis (98%) than in patients with per
itoneal carcinomatosis (70%) (p < .01). Micronodules (less than 5 mm i
n diameter) were noted in approximately one half of patients with tube
rculous peritonitis or peritoneal carcinomatosis, but macronodules (gr
eater than or equal to 5 mm in diameter) were much more frequently see
n in patients with tuberculous peritonitis (52%) than in patients with
peritoneal carcinomatosis (12%) (p < .01). The omentum appeared to be
more irregularly infiltrated in peritoneal carcinomatosis patients (p
< .01). The thin omental line covering the infiltrated omentum was se
en in 13 patients with tuberculous peritonitis but in only four patien
ts with peritoneal carcinomatosis (p < .01). In peritoneal or extraper
itoneal masses in patients with tuberculous peritonitis, a low-density
center was seen in 18 cases (43%) and calcification was noted in six
cases (14%). The prevalences of splenomegaly and splenic calcification
were higher in patients with tuberculous peritonitis. Using multivari
ate analysis, we calculated the sensitivity of CT for predicting tuber
culous peritonitis and peritoneal carcinomatosis as 69% and 91%, respe
ctively. CONCLUSION. Although most CT findings that we analyzed overla
p these diseases, using a combination of CT findings increased our abi
lity to distinguish tuberculous peritonitis from peritoneal carcinomat
osis.