Insurance companies, Like other financial institutions, have been evol
ving from specialized businesses to enterprises offering a variety of
financial services. Rising interest rates impelled this evolution duri
ng much of the past three decades as most insurers tried to remain com
petitive. However, as insurers' profit margins subsided and they attra
cted new business, their assets generally grew more rapidly than their
capital. To maintain the safety and soundness of insurance companies,
regulators increasingly are adopting risk-based capital requirements
instead of rules that limit insurers' investments and contracts, but t
hese standards measure neither the protection for policyholders embedd
ed in insurers' portfolios nor the rate at which this protection might
change with economic conditions. The author suggests that risk manage
rs and regulators might use the models behind value-at-risk calculatio
ns to isolate those economic conditions that threaten the solvency of
insurance companies. A conservative policy might require that insurers
adopt financial strategies that limit their maximum losses for all ''
feasible'' conditions, a kind of minimax strategy. This version of ris
k-based capital requirements might reveal best the risks that insuranc
e companies are bearing and, when necessary, might tie their need for
capital more directly to these risks, rather than to their commitments
to individual assets and liabilities.