Little is known about the accuracy of usual-care providers' detection
of pregnant smokers. This study explored the proportion of pregnant wo
men misclassified as nonsmokers by midwives in a public antenatal clin
ic. A sample of 204 women whom midwives classified as nonsmokers were
asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire and to provide a u
rine specimen for cotinine analysis. Results indicate that midwives fa
iled to detect a significant proportion of smokers. The conservative e
stimate of the proportion of midwife-identified nonsmokers who could b
e reclassified as smokers on the basis of the questionnaire and urinal
ysis procedures was 7.4% (95% CI 3.8-10.9%), the medium estimate was 8
.8% (95% CI 4.9-12.7%) and the worst-case estimate was 15.2% (95% CI 1
0.3-20.1%). To increase the cover age achieved by smoking-cessation pr
ograms, antenatal clinics should consider incorporating biochemical me
asurements into routine screening procedures. Future studies examining
smoking status in pregnancy should detail the methods used to classif
y subjects and document response rates in relation to each self-report
and biochemical measurement.