CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF NONHEALING PERIRADICULAR PATHOSIS - SURGERY VERSUS ENDODONTIC RETREATMENT

Citation
J. Danin et al., CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF NONHEALING PERIRADICULAR PATHOSIS - SURGERY VERSUS ENDODONTIC RETREATMENT, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics, 82(2), 1996, pp. 213-217
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Pathology,Surgery,"Dentistry,Oral Surgery & Medicine
ISSN journal
10792104
Volume
82
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
213 - 217
Database
ISI
SICI code
1079-2104(1996)82:2<213:CMONPP>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Nonhealing periradicular pathosis associated with endodontically treat ed teeth is customarily managed by revision (retreatment). Root-end re section is less often the first choice of treatment. Objectives. This prospective randomized study compared the outcome of retreatment and s urgical intervention in root canal treated teeth with nonhealing perir adicular pathosis. Study design. One such tooth from each of 38 patien ts was randomly allotted to retreatment or root-end resection and root -end filling. Treatment outcome after 1 year was evaluated and compare d clinically and radiographically. Results. The success rate for surge ry was higher than for conventional retreatment, but the difference wa s not statistically significant. Conclusions. For management of nonhea ling periradicular pathosis associated with root canal treated teeth, surgical intervention should be considered as an alternative to retrea tment. In cases with a similar prognosis for both modes of treatment, the choice should be governed by consideration of intrinsic and extrin sic factors.