De. Johnson et al., GLASS WOOL COLUMN FILTRATION VERSUS MINI-PERCOLL GRADIENT FOR PROCESSING POOR QUALITY SEMEN SAMPLES, Fertility and sterility, 66(3), 1996, pp. 459-462
Objective: To compare the quality and number of spermatozoa recovered
from laboratory-induced severe oligozoospermic specimens processed by
mini-Percoll gradient and glass wool column filtration. Design: Both s
perm-processing procedures were compared in similar sperm samples adju
sted to contain equal low numbers of motile spermatozoa using either d
ilution (oligozoospermia) or with the addition of killed sperm (oligoa
sthenozoospermia). The spermatozoa processed by both procedures sample
s were evaluated for motility, response to hypo-osmotic swelling test,
and the hemizona assay. Patients: Five healthy fertile sperm donors.
Setting: Private Andrology Laboratory and University Hospital. Main Ou
tcome Measure: Sperm motility, hypo-osmotic swelling test, and hemizon
a assay results determined the efficacy of the sperm-processing proced
ures. Results: The concentration of sperm recovered after both procedu
res was not affected by either preparation or processing methods. Glas
s wool-processed sperm had higher motility in oligoasthenozoospermic s
amples, bound tightly to hemizonae in higher mean numbers, and demonst
rated a higher percentage of membrane-intact spermatozoa in oligozoosp
ermic samples. Conclusion: Laboratory-prepared oligozoospermic samples
subjected to glass wool filtration yielded more functionally intact s
permatozoa than mini-Percoll gradient processing.