Purpose: To determine the adequacy of documenting the preoperative eva
luation for cataract surgery using criteria derived from published pra
ctice guidelines. Methods: In 1990, 1139 surgeries that were performed
on 1139 patients at ten institutions of the Academic Medical Center C
onsortium were reviewed for completeness of documentation of the preop
erative evaluation. Criteria for completeness were derived from the Am
erican Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern on cataract
evaluation and the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research-sponsor
ed guidelines. Results: Twenty-six percent of charts lacked documentat
ion of at least one of four basic elements of the preoperative evaluat
ion. These four elements are (1) vision in the surgical eye; (2) visio
n in the fellow eye; (3) evaluation of the fundus, macula, or visual p
otential in the surgical eye; and (4) presence of some form (general o
r specific) of functional visual impairment, if, as stated in the guid
eline, a specific deficit in visual functioning should be identified,
then 40% of charts fail to meet criteria. Conclusion: Documentation of
the ocular preoperative assessment for cataract surgery is inadequate
in more than one quarter of cases. The relation between lack of docum
entation and incompleteness of the examination is unknown, Improved do
cumentation is needed to better measure and enhance the quality of car
e.