Governments in Italy both change and remain the same. From 1946 to 199
2 the Christian Democratic Party always held governing power. But almo
st no cabinet stayed in office more than a few years, and many governm
ents collapsed after only a few months. How can instability coexist wi
th stability in this way? How can governments break up at such low cos
t and with so little effect on alternation? These questions are rooted
in-but not resolved by-the available game-theoretic literature on coa
litional behavior. My answer is that politicians' purposive actions ca
n reduce the costs of coalition. I argue that the costs of making, bre
aking, and maintaining coalitions depend on political institutions and
on the array of parties and voters in policy space. Institutional and
spatial conditions structure politicians' opportunities and attempts
to lower costs. Under some conditions, as I show, coalitions are cheap
, and politicians can easily make coalitions even cheaper. The inferen
ce is that this framework comprehends both Italy's extremes and the de
grees of stability found in other parliamentary democracies.