Mm. Reddy et Cl. Bell, DISTINCT CELLULAR MECHANISMS OF CHOLINERGIC AND BETA-ADRENERGIC SWEATSECRETION, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology, 40(2), 1996, pp. 486-494
The cholinergic and beta-adrenergic sweat secretions from human sweat
glands differ with respect to secretory rates and their susceptibility
to cystic fibrosis (CF). Using the cultured beta-adrenergic-sensitive
sweat secretory cell, we sought to determine the intracellular electr
ophysiological mechanisms underlying these functional differences. We
found that the cholinergic agonist methacholine (10(-6) M) induced a C
a2+-dependent biphasic membrane potential (V-m) response: an initial h
yperpolarization and a secondary depolarization. The initial hyper pol
arization was independent of bath Cl- and dependent on transmembrane K
+ gradient. However, the secondary depolarization of V-m was dependent
on bath Cl-. In contrast, the beta-adrenergic agonist isoproterenol (
10(-5) M) induced a monophasic depolarization of V-m. This depolarizat
ion was 1) dependent on bath Cl-, 2) independent of K+ conductance (GR
) blocker Ba2+ (5 mM), 3) unaffected by the methacholine-induced secon
dary depolarization of V-m, and 4) absent in cells derived from CF sub
jects. These results indicated that the cholinergic agonist-induced se
cretion mainly involves the activation of Ca2+-dependent G(K) and Cl-
conductance (G(Cl)), whereas the beta-adrenergic secretion seems to ma
inly depend on. the activation of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conduc
tance regulator-G(Cl).