Mmc. Tielvanbuul et al., MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING VERSUS BONE-SCINTIGRAPHY IN SUSPECTED SCAPHOID FRACTURE, European journal of nuclear medicine, 23(8), 1996, pp. 971-975
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become increasingly useful in the
evaluation of musculoskeletal problems, including those of the wrist.
In patients with a wrist injury, MRI is used mainly to assess vascula
rity of scaphoid non-union. However, the use of MRI in patients in the
acute phase following carpal injury is not common. Three-phase bone s
cintigraphy is routinely performed from at least 72 h after injury in
patients with suspected scaphoid fracture and negative initial radiogr
aphs, We evaluated MRI in this patient group, The bone scan was used a
s the reference method. Nineteen patients were included. Bone scintigr
aphy was performed in all 19 patients, but MRI could be obtained in on
ly 16 (in three patients, MRI was stopped owing to claustrophobia). In
five patients, MRI confirmed a scintigraphically suspected scaphoid f
racture. In one patient, a perilunar luxation, without a fracture, was
seen on MRI, while bone scintigraphy showed a hot spot in the region
of the lunate bone, suspected for fracture. This was confirmed by surg
ery. In two patients, a hot spot in the scaphoid region was suspected
for scaphoid fracture, and immobilization and employed for a period of
12 weeks. MRI was negative in both cases; in one of them a scaphoid f
racture was retrospectively proven on the initial X-ray series, In ano
ther two patients, a hot spot in the region of MCP I was found with a
negative MRI. In both, the therapy was adjusted. In the remaining six
patients, both modalities were negative, We conclude that in the diagn
ostic management of patients with suspected scaphoid fracture and nega
tive initial radiographs, the use of MRI may be promising, but is not
superior to three-phase bone scintigraphy.