ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY AND THE FAMILY

Authors
Citation
Ja. Robertson, ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY AND THE FAMILY, Hastings law journal, 47(4), 1996, pp. 911
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Law
Journal title
ISSN journal
00178322
Volume
47
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Database
ISI
SICI code
0017-8322(1996)47:4<911:ARTATF>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
In his Article, Professor Robertson addresses policy issues related to the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) and the industry which they have spawned. The Article identifies four major areas of p olicy issues relating to ARTs: medical efficacy, access to ARTs, legal infrastructure, and regulation. The Article focuses on the latter two : legal infrastructure and regulation. Professor Robertson contends th at, although ARTs can be used to form families that differ from the tr aditional notion of a family (in which children are produced coitally and are genetically related to both parents), ARTs should not be seen as a threat to this tradition because the most common goal of ARTs is to produce children biologically related to at least one of the parent s. Thus, the process of creating a family should be treated equally re gardless of whether ARTs are used. Professor Robertson explores the ne ed for the development of legal infrastructure to deal with disputes t hat can arise from ARTs. The two paradigmatic situations that arise ar e disputes between the parties who provide gametes over their disposit ion, and disputes between the gamete providers and the program or orga nization providing the ART concerning ownership and control of the gam etes or their products. The author also reviews the current system for regulating the provision of ARTs and discusses whether further effort s at regulation are desirable and how such efforts might be structured .