S. Chocron et al., INTEROBSERVER RELIABILITY IN THE INTERPRETATION OF CORONARY ANGIOGRAMS, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 10(8), 1996, pp. 671-675
The interpretation of coronary angiograms is indispensable in determin
ing procedure in coronary surgery. The aim of this study was to measur
e the overall reliability of a group of surgeons in the interpretation
of coronary angiograms, surgical procedure and the evaluation of oper
ative risk. Ten coronary angiograms were interpreted by eight cardiac
surgeons at four different medical centers. Evaluation of coding discr
epancies, in this case of multiple raters applying an ordinal-scale cl
assification scheme (0, 1, 2) with no expert yardstick available for c
oding, was explored by a two-way random factor analysis of variance. R
eliability was substantial for the assessment of stenosis irrespective
of the artery (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ranging from
0.9% to 1), and good for the distal part of the artery (ICC ranging fr
om 0.83 to 0.86) as well as for the collateral provision (ICC ranging
from 0.75 to 0.94). Agreement between surgeons was good with respect t
o the number of bypasses to be performed (ICC = 0.88). The number of b
ypass per patient varied from 2.6 to 3.2 depending on the surgeon. Agr
eement as to whether or not to bypass was substantial for the right co
ronary artery (ICC = 0.92), good for the marginal artery (ICC = 0.87)
and fair for the left anterior descending artery (ICC = 0.60) and the
circumflex artery (ICC = 0.60). There was a higher rate of agreement c
oncerning inferior wall motion (ICC = 0.98) than of the anterior wall
motion (ICC = 0.78). Agreement was substantial for ejection fraction (
ICC = 0.93), operative risk (ICC = 0.93) and the type of coronary tree
(ICC = 0.85). With respect to the overall set of items, no one surgeo
n disagreed significantly with the rest of the group. Some disagreemen
t regarding anatomy suitable for revascularization exists between surg
eons, Surgical assessment of risk is similar. Cardiac surgeons quickly
learn to assess risk in a similar manner, even though they might not
always graft the same anatomic vessels or assess regional wall motion
similarly.