INTEROBSERVER RELIABILITY IN THE INTERPRETATION OF CORONARY ANGIOGRAMS

Citation
S. Chocron et al., INTEROBSERVER RELIABILITY IN THE INTERPRETATION OF CORONARY ANGIOGRAMS, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 10(8), 1996, pp. 671-675
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
ISSN journal
10107940
Volume
10
Issue
8
Year of publication
1996
Pages
671 - 675
Database
ISI
SICI code
1010-7940(1996)10:8<671:IRITIO>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
The interpretation of coronary angiograms is indispensable in determin ing procedure in coronary surgery. The aim of this study was to measur e the overall reliability of a group of surgeons in the interpretation of coronary angiograms, surgical procedure and the evaluation of oper ative risk. Ten coronary angiograms were interpreted by eight cardiac surgeons at four different medical centers. Evaluation of coding discr epancies, in this case of multiple raters applying an ordinal-scale cl assification scheme (0, 1, 2) with no expert yardstick available for c oding, was explored by a two-way random factor analysis of variance. R eliability was substantial for the assessment of stenosis irrespective of the artery (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ranging from 0.9% to 1), and good for the distal part of the artery (ICC ranging fr om 0.83 to 0.86) as well as for the collateral provision (ICC ranging from 0.75 to 0.94). Agreement between surgeons was good with respect t o the number of bypasses to be performed (ICC = 0.88). The number of b ypass per patient varied from 2.6 to 3.2 depending on the surgeon. Agr eement as to whether or not to bypass was substantial for the right co ronary artery (ICC = 0.92), good for the marginal artery (ICC = 0.87) and fair for the left anterior descending artery (ICC = 0.60) and the circumflex artery (ICC = 0.60). There was a higher rate of agreement c oncerning inferior wall motion (ICC = 0.98) than of the anterior wall motion (ICC = 0.78). Agreement was substantial for ejection fraction ( ICC = 0.93), operative risk (ICC = 0.93) and the type of coronary tree (ICC = 0.85). With respect to the overall set of items, no one surgeo n disagreed significantly with the rest of the group. Some disagreemen t regarding anatomy suitable for revascularization exists between surg eons, Surgical assessment of risk is similar. Cardiac surgeons quickly learn to assess risk in a similar manner, even though they might not always graft the same anatomic vessels or assess regional wall motion similarly.