Se. Emery et al., CERAMIC ANTERIOR SPINAL-FUSION - BIOLOGIC AND BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON IN A CANINE MODEL, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 21(23), 1996, pp. 2713-2719
Study Design, Three types of porous ceramic bone graft substitutes wer
e used for anterior interbody fusion in the canine thoracic spine. Obj
ectives. To compare the biomechanical stiffness and histologic appeara
nce of fused spinal segments using ceramic graft substitutes versus au
togenous bone graft. Summary of Background Data. The relative success
or failure of ceramic grafts is influenced by many variables including
the composition of the ceramic, location in the spine, stability, and
the animal model used. Methods. Four experimental groups were evaluat
ed: autogenous tricortical iliac crest (n = 6); hydroxyapatite ceramic
(Interpore-200; n = 6); biphasic (60:40) hydroxyapatite/tricalcium ph
osphate ceramic (Zimmer; n = 4); and calcium carbonate ceramic (Inoteb
; n = 4). All dogs were killed 8 weeks after surgery. After postmortem
removal of anterior spinal instrumentation, the spinal segments under
went nondestructive biomechanical testing and light microscopic histol
ogic evaluation. Results. Biomechanical testing showed that spines fro
m the autogenous tricortical iliac crest group were statistically sign
ificantly stiffer in flexion, extension, left and eight bending, and t
orsion than all ceramic groups. No differences in stiffnesses were obs
erved among the three ceramic groups. Histologically, the autogenous t
ricortical iliac crest graft performed best, with osseous union at 10
of 12 interfaces. Of the ceramic grafts, hydroxyapatite/tricalcium pho
sphate and calcium carbonate demonstrated more consistent junction hea
ling than the hydroxyapatite group, where four of 12 interfaces result
ed in a nonunion, In the ceramic groups, a variable amount of revascul
arization and new bone was observed within the grafts. Conclusions. Au
togenous iliac crest bone graft provides superior healing in this ante
rior spine fusion model. Additional investigation is needed before cer
amic grafts can be considered satisfactory alternatives to anterior au
togenous bone grafts.