The purpose of this paper is to ascertain the cost-effectiveness of se
mi-Lagrangian advection schemes for a wide variety of geophysical flow
s at all scales. The approach used is first to determine the minimum c
omputational overhead associated with these schemes and then to examin
e temporal Variability in the Lagrangian and Eulerian frames by employ
ing simple turbulent cascade phenomenologies. The goal is to evaluate
whether the Lagrangian variability is sufficiently slower than that of
the Eulerian frame to overcome the computational overhead. It is foun
d that the most efficient semi-Lagrangian schemes require a factor of
5-10 times more floating point operations per grid point per time step
than the classic second-order leapfrog scheme. In the enstrophy casca
de of 2D or quasigeostrophic turbulence, evolution of flow quantities
is considerably slower in the Lagrangian frame and semi-Lagrangian adv
ection schemes can be very cost-effective. In an energy cascade such a
s the Kolmogorov range of 3D turbulence or the inverse cascade of QG o
r 2D turbulence, the Lagrangian evolution remains slower than the Eule
rian evolution. However, the difference is very much less than in the
enstrophy cascade. Since the computational overhead of semi-Lagrangian
schemes is considerable, they are at best marginally cost-effective a
t current resolutions for these flows, which prevail in the atmosphere
at scales below 300-400 km. In the presence of stationary forcing fie
lds in the Eulerian frame, the time step must respect the advective ti
mescale even in the Lagrangian frame, at length scales where the forci
ng is significant. Hen semi-Lagrangian schemes are not recommended.