We contrast results from a laboratory experiment in voluntary contribu
tions for a public good using two reward structures with interior equi
libria. The first induces a set of Nash equilibria, all sharing the sa
me total donations. The second induces a unique dominant-strategy equi
librium. Apparently, donor confusion over the Nash concept and coordin
ation problems explain at most a small portion of the 'excessive' givi
ng observed in those previous experiments that use an interior Nash de
sign. Thus, we strengthen the case for interpreting experimental resul
ts as consistent with altruistic preferences that are not easily overc
ome by experimental induction.