Ojf. Martin et al., DIELECTRIC VERSUS TOPOGRAPHIC CONTRAST IN NEAR-FIELD MICROSCOPY, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science,and vision., 13(9), 1996, pp. 1801-1808
Using a fully vectorial three-dimensional numerical approach (generali
zed field propagator, based on Green's tensor technique), we investiga
te the near-field images produced by subwavelength objects buried in a
dielectric surface. We study the influence of the object index, size,
and depth on the near field. We emphasize the similarity between the
near field spawned by an object buried in the surface (dielectric cont
rast) and that spawned by a protrusion on the surface (topographic con
trast). We show that a buried object with a negative dielectric contra
st (i.e., with a smaller index than its surrounding medium) produces a
near-field image that is reversed from that of an object with a posit
ive contrast. (C) 1996 Optical Society of America.