PHOTOSYNTHETIC AND GROWTH-RESPONSES OF CATTAIL (TYPHA-DOMINGENSIS) AND SAWGRASS (CLADIUM-JAMAICENSE) TO SOIL REDOX CONDITIONS

Citation
Sr. Pezeshki et al., PHOTOSYNTHETIC AND GROWTH-RESPONSES OF CATTAIL (TYPHA-DOMINGENSIS) AND SAWGRASS (CLADIUM-JAMAICENSE) TO SOIL REDOX CONDITIONS, Aquatic botany, 54(1), 1996, pp. 25-35
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences","Marine & Freshwater Biology
Journal title
ISSN journal
03043770
Volume
54
Issue
1
Year of publication
1996
Pages
25 - 35
Database
ISI
SICI code
0304-3770(1996)54:1<25:PAGOC(>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Under controlled laboratory conditions, cattail (Typha domingensis Per s.) and sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense Crantz) were subjected to a range of soil redox potential (Eh) including +500, +250, 0 and -200 mV and plant photosynthetic activity and growth responses were measured. In b oth species, light saturation was not achieved at the highest photon i rradiance of 1100 mu mol m(-2) s(-1). Sawgrass showed greater photosyn thetic capacity per unit area of leaf at higher irradiances than catta il. However, light compensation points were estimated at 25 and 60 mu mol m(-2) s(-1) for cattail and sawgrass, respectively, In both specie s, stomatal conductance was reduced significantly in response to the l owest Eh condition (-200 mV). Net photosynthesis decreased significant ly in both species in response to the reduced Eh conditions, but there were differences, The reductions were proportionally greater in sawgr ass than in cattail. Thus, at -200 mV Eh, net photosynthesis was reduc ed by 71% for cattail; while in sawgrass there was no net photosynthes is, only respiration. Cattail showed significantly greater net photosy nthetic rates as compared with sawgrass at the lowest Eh treatment (-2 00 mV). Although total biomass was reduced in both species in response to low Eh conditions, it nevertheless was significantly greater in ca ttail than sawgrass under 0 and -200 mV soil Eh treatments. However, t he biomass allocation pattern did not differ between the two species a cross treatments. Results of the present study support the hypothesis that in both species differences in pattern of site occupancy and comp etition under low soil oxygen conditions may be partially explained by differences in their photosynthetic characteristics and photosyntheti c acclimation to oxygen-deficient environments.