The first 100 consecutive shoulder arthroscopic procedures performed u
nder interscalene anesthesia at a small community-sized military hospi
tal are the basis of this report. This method of anesthesia was compar
ed with 100 shoulder arthroscopies performed in a previous 2-year time
period under general anesthesia. A variety of arthroscopic and subseq
uent open reconstructive procedures about the shoulder were performed
using both techniques, Using the interscalene method, 87 regional bloc
ks were entirely successful. Thirteen patients required conversion to
general anesthesia for adequate pain control; however, 4 of these had
a complete block in the recovery room and required no postoperative na
rcotics. Seven patients required supplementation with local anesthetic
when an open procedure became necessary. There were no major complica
tions. Minor complications included 5 patients with transient Horner's
syndrome, 4 patients who experienced anxiety, which was controlled wi
th sedation, and 3 with nausea or pruritus. Interscalene anesthesia pr
ovided excellent intraoperative and postoperative analgesia with low m
orbidity. On a subsequent questionnaire, all patients with a successfu
l block reported that they were extremely satisfied with their experie
nce. Ten patients who had previous shoulder surgery under general anes
thesia preferred the interscalene method. In summary, interscalene ane
sthesia proved to be an excellent method of anesthesia for shoulder ar
throscopy. The technique is reproducible within the resources availabl
e in most community-level hospitals.