L. Bonomo et al., LUNG-CANCER STAGING - THE ROLE OF COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING, European journal of radiology, 23(1), 1996, pp. 35-45
Because complete resection remains the only reliable method of cure of
lung cancer, one important aim of preoperative staging is to select p
atients with localised disease who may benefit from surgery, while avo
iding unnecessary thoracotomies in patients with unresectable neoplasm
. Computed tomography (CT) of the chest is a valuable method for stagi
ng local and regional spread of lung neoplasms, although limitations i
n its accuracy are well-known. While gross invasion of the mediastinum
and major structures as well as the presence of metastatic disease ca
n be easily demonstrated with CT, differentiation between tumour conti
guity and subtle invasion of mediastinum or chest wall often remains a
problem. Although magnetic resonance imagaing (MRI) may have the same
limitations as CT, in specific situations it may b superior in diagno
sing minimal chest wall or mediastinal invasion. Moreover, MRI is usef
ul in the assessment of patients with superior sulcus tumours as well
as in patients with contraindication to intravenous administration of
ionic contrast material. Since nodal size is the only useful criterion
for evaluating lymph node metastases, CT and MRI show similar, poor a
ccuracies in lymph node staging reesulting from both low sensitivity (
normal-sized nodes may contain microscopic metastases) and low specifi
city (enlarged lymph nodes may be reactive). For this reason, if enlar
ged lymph nodes are detected, further evaluation is recommended before
excluding the patient from a potentially curative resection. Advantag
es and limitations of CT and MRI in the preoperative staging of non-sm
all-cell carcinoma are reviewed in this article. The imaging of small-
cell carcinoma is not included because most patients with this cell ty
pe do not benefit from surgical resection. Similarly we do not discuss
imaging of distant metastases.