We consider the effect on profitability of using increasingly sophisti
cated regression-based methods of estimating and interpreting the para
meters of the demand curve facing the neoclassical firm that newly ent
ers an existing product market. Through simulation it is shown that in
this particular setting the differences in the firm's subsequent prof
it performance over the range of the different methods are de minimus.
The demands these methods make upon the decision maker, however, diff
er substantially. These results prompt us to question whether comparab
le results in alternative real-world settings might not be more pervas
ive than we as theoreticians would like to believe is the ease. We spe
culate that all too often the profit payoff from the use of even-more-
sophisticated decision-making techniques Hill fail to justify the requ
ired effort. And, further, that even managers who are well versed in s
ophisticated decision-making procedures are not unlikely to find their
talents stretched to the lmit well before they reach the point of dim
inishing returns.