The proportion of patients with total parenteral nutrition (TPN)-assoc
iated cholestasis (TPN-AC) who have necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) ha
s increased markedly in the past ten years. Little is known about how
these diseases affect each other. We retrospectively studied 24 patien
ts with NEC and bowel necrosis or perforation who required surgical in
tervention. Patients were divided into two groups: those who had recei
ved TPN (NEC + TPN, n = 17) and those who had not (NEC, n = 7). As cho
lestasis was present clinically. or prolonged TPN was anticipated, liv
er biopsy was done. Bile acid levels were measured in both serum and b
ile in 13 patients. Six patients, who underwent bowel resection and en
terostomy, had a second liver biopsy and measurement of bile acid leve
ls at stoma closure. Our results showed that in 13 patients for whom b
ile acid levels were measured (NEC + TPN, n = 6) (NEC, n = 7), serum b
ile acid level was significantly elevated in both groups over normal f
or age. Biliary bile acid levels were correspondingly depressed in bot
h groups suggesting a failure of bile acid transport. All patients had
abnormal liver histology, but the pattern of injury differed between
the two groups. Those in the NEC group had biliary stasis and mild hep
atocyte degeneration. In contrast. 15 of 17 in the NEC + TPN group had
advanced injury specific for TPN-AC, All six patients managed on TPN
and partial enteral feeding before a second biopsy had no change in bi
le acid levels and progression of histologic injury. We conclude that
NEC alone can cause functional cholestasis and histologic liver injury
but does not cause the specific progressive damage caused by TPN. NEC
map make the liver more susceptible to the effects of TPN. Partial en
teral feeding does not halt or reverse this injury.