Me. Goldberg et al., MEDICAL WASTE IN THE ENVIRONMENT - DO ANESTHESIA PERSONNEL HAVE A ROLE TO PLAY, Journal of clinical anesthesia, 8(6), 1996, pp. 475-479
Study Objective: To conduct a feasibility study of the mechanics of re
cycling single-use anesthesia breathing systems and practices of anest
hesiologists and nurse-anesthetists in a tri-state region. Study Desig
n: Two-part, open, prospective analysis using pre-printed questionnair
e and cost/time analysis of labor and materials. Setting: Questionnair
e sent to 413 anesthesiology departments in Pennsylvania Neu Jersey, a
nd Delaware, and hospital/recycling facility for evaluation of time an
d cost. Measurements and Main Results: Time to disassemble and sort th
e breathing circuits, analysis of costs and obtainable income from byp
roducts of recycling, and standard survey questionnaire concerning dem
ographic characteristics of respondents and individual department/hosp
ital practitioners. Data analysis included analysis of variance and Kr
uskal-Wallis tests. Pilot analysis: Sorting of circuits to economic co
mponent required ten minutes at an average cost of $1.60. Value of scr
aps obtainable was $3.44, leaving a gross margin of $1.84 for a box of
18 circuits. Benefit analysis: Extended reduction in, the regulated m
edical waste in our operating room of 16,875 lb, saving $4,387.50 per
year. With generation of revenue from scrap, the net gain is $5,994.64
per yr. Questionnaire: Majority (83%) of departments polled would par
ticipate in recycling implemented by suppliers. Most respondents would
not consider (58%) recycling unless mandated by law. Conclusion: The
program described is cost-effective and environmentally beneficial.