IMPACT OF MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION SINGLE-PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY ON REFERRAL TO CATHETERIZATION OF THE VERY ELDERLY - IS THERE EVIDENCE OF GENDER-RELATED REFERRAL BIAS
Am. Amanullah et al., IMPACT OF MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION SINGLE-PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY ON REFERRAL TO CATHETERIZATION OF THE VERY ELDERLY - IS THERE EVIDENCE OF GENDER-RELATED REFERRAL BIAS, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 28(3), 1996, pp. 680-686
Objectives. This study sought to assess the impact of myocardial perfu
sion studies on subsequent: management in the very elderly with respec
t to referral to catheterization or revascularization. Background. The
very elderly are a rapidly growing segment of the U.S. population, an
d myocardial perfusion studies are frequently performed in this patien
t subset for evaluation of coronary artery disease. Methods. The study
utilized 1,006 consecutive patients greater than or equal to 80 gears
old (511 men, 495 women) who underwent stress myocardial perfusion si
ngle-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using pharmacologic s
tress (n = 605) or treadmill exercise (n = 401). Referral to catheteri
zation or revascularization within 60 days of the nuclear scan was cor
related with clinical and nuclear variables. Results. Catheterization
and revascularization mere performed in 119 and 77 patients, respectiv
ely. Stratification of referral rates showed a low rate in normal and
mildly abnormal scan categories and significantly higher rates in pati
ents with severely abnormal scan results irrespective of the presentin
g symptoms or pretest likelihood of coronary artery disease, Multiple
logistic regression analysis of clinical and nuclear variables reveale
d that extent and severity of reversibility by SPECT and the final sca
n result were the two most powerful predictors of referral to catheter
ization and revascularization in men and women (catheterization: chi-s
quare 65 and 78; revascularization: chi-square 37 and 68, respectively
). Overall, referral rates to catheterization and revascularization we
re similar in men and women (catheterization: 13% vs. 11%; revasculari
zation: 8% vs. 8%, respectively). However, women with severely abnorma
l scan results were more frequently referred to catheterization (28% v
s. 18%, p < 0.03) and revascularization (21% vs. 12%, p < 0.01) than m
en. Conclusions. In patients greater than or equal to 80 years old, my
ocardial perfusion SPECT had a significant impact on patient managemen
t. The apparent discrepancy in referral rates for interventional manag
ement in men and women is unexplained hut mag be appropriate in light
of our previous observations that women with severely abnormal scan re
sults are at increased risk for hard cardiac events than are men with
severely abnormal scan results.