J. Levine et Se. Underwood, A MULTIATTRIBUTE ANALYSIS OF GOALS FOR INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM-PLANNING, Transportation research. Part C, Emerging technologies, 4(2), 1996, pp. 97-111
Transportation planning in general, and planning for Intelligent Trans
portation Systems (TTS) in particular, are notable both for multiple g
oals and for multiple constituencies. In response to this policy envir
onment, multicriteria decision analysis has often been utilized to eva
luate alternative transportation investments. This approach is extende
d here to assess stakeholder valuation of broad goals of an ITS planni
ng process, the FAST-TRAC operational field test in Oakland County, a
suburban region of metropolitan Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A. Representati
ves of stakeholder groups, ranging from emergency response firm employ
ees to city managers to environmental groups, were interviewed. Using
a modified Analytical Hierarchy Process, implicit preference weights f
or transportation planning goals were derived, and inter- and intragro
up comparisons made. Overall, collision reduction emerged as a dominan
t goal accounting for nearly 35% of the overall valuation of all goals
. In contrast, travel time reduction and energy/environmental impacts
each accounted for about 20% of the total valuation. Stakeholder group
affiliation appeared to affect transportation system preferences most
strongly with regard to environmental preferences and reduction in co
mmercial travel time; with regard to other goals, individual interests
seemed to dominate those of the ostensible stakeholder group. In an e
nvironment such as that of ITS, in which policy goals are diverse and
potentially conflicting, the methodologies presented here can aid in p
olicy and system design by gauging the relative preferences of strongl
y interested individuals and groups. While the specific findings prese
nted here are not generalizable to other regions, they underscore the
relative importance of a range of ITS goals apart from simple reductio
ns in travel times. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd