PATIENTS EXPECTATIONS OF AN IDEAL DENTIST AND THEIR VIEWS CONCERNING THE DENTIST THEY VISITED - DO THE VIEWS CONFORM TO THE EXPECTATIONS AND WHAT DETERMINES HOW WELL THEY CONFORM
S. Lahti et al., PATIENTS EXPECTATIONS OF AN IDEAL DENTIST AND THEIR VIEWS CONCERNING THE DENTIST THEY VISITED - DO THE VIEWS CONFORM TO THE EXPECTATIONS AND WHAT DETERMINES HOW WELL THEY CONFORM, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology, 24(4), 1996, pp. 240-244
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry,Oral Surgery & Medicine","Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
A convenience sample of patients (n=271) from community health centres
and private clinics in different parts of Finland were recruited for
this study through their dental clinic. Equal numbers of regular and i
rregular clients were invited to participate. Before the treatment pro
cedure, each patient filled out a questionnaire with forty Likertian s
tatements dealing with their expectations of an ideal dentist, and nin
e about their own background, i.e., age, sex, regularity of dental vis
its. basic and professional education, and occupation. After the treat
ment subjects described their treating dentists' behaviour using simil
ar statements. In the analyses two approaches were applied. First, fac
tor analyses with orthogonal varimax rotation were conducted with the
data about the ideal and actual dentist. For the ideal dentist, five f
actors were extracted: 1) mutual communication, 2) fair support, 3) pe
rsonal appearance, 4) preferred type of practice, and 5) blaming; and
for the actual dentist 5 factors were extracted: 1) mutual communicati
on, 2) pain control, 3) fair support, 4) personal appearance, and 5) p
referred type of practice. The factor structures were found to be simi
lar when they were compared with transformation analysis. This justifi
ed the second analysis where the differences between the ideal and the
actual factor scores were compared. The expectations of the patients
were met on all the other dentist characteristics except mutual commun
ication and fair support. There were not many differences between subg
roups of patients. In further studies, other background variables, suc
h as previous experiences of the patients, should be considered in ord
er to obtain a more complete explanation of the variation in satisfact
ion. More attention should be paid to the communication skills of the
dentists.