Background: Moray eels (Muraenidae, Pisces) are among the largest bent
hic predators of littoral habitats, particularly in warm seas and cora
l reefs. They seek food either by olfaction or visually, moving across
the pebbles and rocks. Their skin forms a strong, protective layer. T
his study examines the comparative morphology and cytology of the skin
of moray eels adapted to such lifestyles. Methods: The studied eels w
ere collected in the Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea and sacrificed by an overd
ose of MS222. Skin selections from different body sites were dissected
and fixed for light and electron microscopy. Results: The skin of mor
ay eels (Siderea grisea, Lycodontis nudivomer, Gymnothorax undulata, G
. hepaticus, Rhinomuraena amboensis) and the heterocongrid garden eel
(Gorgasia sillneri) reveal considerable adaptation of the integument t
o their different Lifestyles, on and within the various bottom substra
te. All the eels studied featured skin comprising a multilayered, stra
tified epidermis and a compact, collagenous dermis, with thickness of
up to 2 mm, much thicker than that observed in their free-swimming rel
atives. The thickness and cytology of the two skin layers differ in th
e various species on different body sites within the same species and
also changes with age. Pronounced differences were observed in the num
ber and type of mucus-producing cells in the epidermis. In S. grisea,
the entire body is covered by a multiple layer of goblet cells, wherea
s in G. sillneri, sacciform cells predominate, particularly on the cau
dal part of the body where they form an uninterrupted layer, replacing
the supporting cells that surround them. These cells are also dominan
t in R. amboensis. The two latter species are sand-dwelling and the co
pious production of slime from these cells enables the adhesion of san
d granules to their burrow walls. In Gorgasia, a special morphological
adaptation was also observed in its pointed tail-end where the very s
trong dermal collagen forms a rigid device for digging tail-first into
the sand. Conclusion: The differing thicknesses and cytological devel
opments in the skin of marine eels protect these crawling and digging
creatures against abrasive interaction with their sea bottom habitat.
(C) 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.