Objectives: To evaluate in vivo the perfusion of the venous wall in no
rmal veins, varicose veins and in femoral veins of post-phlebitic limb
s recording wall flux with laser Doppler flowmetry. As there is some e
vidence that both structure and microcirculatory dynamic responses are
altered in the abnormal vein wall, we also aimed to study the respons
e of vein wall perfusion to locally induced vasodilatation following p
apaverine infusion. Design: Open prospective study in patients with ve
nous insufficiency and in patients undergoing coronary revascularizati
on with a normal venous system. Setting: Cardiovascular Institute, Chi
eti University, Pierangeli Clinic, Italy and Irvine Laboratory, St Mar
y's Hospital, London, UK. Patients: Twenty-four normal long saphenous
veins and 11 common femoral veins (35 normal veins, 35 subjects) and 4
2 varicose veins (42 patients). Measurements: Venous wall flux was mea
sured on the external surface of normal long saphenous veins and commo
n femoral veins. Measurements were also made on varicose veins before
ligation of the sapheno-femoral junction. All measurements were made w
hen at least three-quarters of the adventitia and periadventitia tissu
e were still intact for a length of 3 cm. Results: Flux in the normal
vein wall was higher (t=5.88; p<0.05) than in varicose veins and in ve
ins of postphlebitic limbs. There was no difference in flux between va
ricose veins and post-phlebitic veins. After intravenous papaverine in
jection in a subgroup of eight normal and eight varicose veins, in the
wall of normal veins there was a significant increase in flux (from 8
.5 (SD 5.1) units to 13.2 (SD 3.8) units; p<0.05) which was not observ
ed in varicose veins. Conclusions: A higher vein wall perfusion was ob
served in normal veins compared with varicose veins and postphlebitic
limb veins. Greater vascular reactivity to intraluminal papaverine inj
ection was observed in normal veins.