COMPARISON OF BASOPHIL HISTAMINE-RELEASE, EOSINOPHIL CATIONIC PROTEINAND NONSPECIFIC AIRWAY RESPONSIVENESS BETWEEN MITE-SENSITIVE ASTHMATIC AND NONASTHMATIC CHILDREN AND NONALLERGIC CONTROLS
K. Takeda et al., COMPARISON OF BASOPHIL HISTAMINE-RELEASE, EOSINOPHIL CATIONIC PROTEINAND NONSPECIFIC AIRWAY RESPONSIVENESS BETWEEN MITE-SENSITIVE ASTHMATIC AND NONASTHMATIC CHILDREN AND NONALLERGIC CONTROLS, Clinical and experimental allergy, 26(8), 1996, pp. 918-925
To understand the relevance of allergy to the development of asthma in
children, we examined basophil histamine release (HR) with Df antigen
, blood eosinophil counts, serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) lev
els, and bronchial responsiveness to methacholine (PC20) in three grou
ps of children, including 36 asthmatics with high. RAST titre for Df (
group 1), 36 non-asthmatics with similarly high RAST titre for Df (gro
up 2) and 21 non-asthmatics with negative RAST titre for Df (group 3).
The amount of Df antigen inducing 50% HR from basophils did not vary
significantly between group 1 and 2 (P>0.05), while none of the cells
responded to higher concentrations of Df in group 3. The mean number o
f blood eosinophils and level of serum ECP were highest in group 1, an
d lowest in group 3, with group 2 being intermediate, and the differen
ces were significant between all three groups (P < 0.01). The mean PC2
0 value was the lowest in group 1, intermediate in group 2, and the hi
ghest in group 3, and the differences were significant between all thr
ee groups (P<0.01). While correlation studies showed that PC20 values
of group 2 subjects significantly correlated with their eosinophil num
bers (r = -0.48, P < 0.01) and ECP levels (r = -0.49, P < 0.01), such
correlations were not found in group 1 subjects. These results suggest
that the degree of the eosinophilic inflammation caused by the allerg
ic reaction to mites is an important factor in determining the clinica
l expression of asthma in atopic subjects.