Y. Nakae et al., COMPARISON OF THE JACKSON-REES CIRCUIT, THE PEDIATRIC CIRCLE, AND THEMERA F BREATHING SYSTEM FOR PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Anesthesia and analgesia, 83(3), 1996, pp. 488-492
The purpose of this study was to compare the Jackson-Rees circuit with
the pediatric circle and MERA F breathing system (MERA F system) for
pediatric anesthesia from the viewpoint of work of breathing (WOB). Tw
enty-three children (2-10 yr old) were studied during spontaneous brea
thing under endotracheal anesthesia with 4 L/min nitrous oxide, 2 L/mi
n oxygen, and 1% end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane. WOB, inspirat
ory and expiratory airway resistance, dynamic compliance (C-DYN), pres
sure time product (PTP), and arterial blood gasses were measured in th
e three circuits. The inspiratory WOB was estimated directly by measur
ing the esophageal pressure-volume loop using the Campbell technique.
In a laboratory study, we measured the compliances of the Jackson-Rees
circuit, the pediatric circle, the MERA F system, and the adult circu
it. WOB differed among the three circuits (MERA F system > pediatric c
ircle > Jackson-Rees circuit). Inspiratory and expiratory resistances,
and arterial carbon dioxide tension in the Jackson-Rees circuit were
significantly lower than those of both the pediatric circle and MERA F
system. The C-DYN and PTP in the MERA F system were significantly hig
her than those in both the Jackson-Rees circuit and the pediatric circ
le. The MERA F system had significantly higher compliance than the Jac
kson-Rees circuit and pediatric circle. It is concluded that the Jacks
on-Rees circuit is most efficient, the pediatric circle is intermediat
e, and the MERA F system is the least efficient from the viewpoint of
WOB during spontaneous breathing for pediatric anesthesia.