Kj. Smith et al., A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF DONOR TOLERANCE OF 400 ML, 200 ML, AND SHAM RED-CELL DONATION, Transfusion, 36(8), 1996, pp. 674-680
Background: Volume replacement could allow the safe collection of twic
e the normal amount of red cells In a standard donation. Studies in sm
all numbers of donors have shown that a temporary decrease in red cell
mass is well tolerated when donors give twice the usual amount (170-2
25 mL) of red cells in a standard 405- to 495-mL donation. Sham-donati
on control groups have not been included in previews studies of increa
sed red cell donation, and perceptions of donation effects could have
been biased. Study Design and Methods: In the study reported here, 17
male and 13 female volunteers were randomly assigned to make a sham do
nation, 1-unit donation, or 2-unit donation on an automated blood cell
separator. Donor tolerance was assessed by ambulatory heart rate moni
toring and by a poststudy interview. Hemoglobin, hematocrit, ferritin,
serum iron, total iron-binding capacity, red cell 2,3 DPG, and serum
erythropoietin were measured before and after donation for comparison
of the erythropoietic responses in the three study groups. Results: Re
d cells collected totaled 206 +/- 10 mL in the 1-unit group and 414 +/
- 21 mL in the 2-unit group. Changes in heart rate, systolic blood pre
ssure, and diastolic blood pressure with donation and changes in heart
rate recorded by ambulatory monitoring did not differ for the experim
ental groups. Postdonation changes from baseline values were evaluated
on Days 2, 7, and 14. Changes in hemoglobin were significantly differ
ent between groups (p<0.017) in all postdonation tests. There were dif
ferences between groups in erythropoietin response, red cell 2,3 DPG,
ferritin levels, and hemoglobin synthesis. Hemoglobin synthesis and me
an changes in 2,3 DPG, erythropoietin, ferritin, and postdonation hemo
globin were greater in the 2-unit group than in the 1-unit group. Conc
lusion: Donor tolerance of red cell donations of 414 +/- 21 mL, a volu
me of red cells twice that in a standard 450-mL blood donation, does n
ot differ from donor tolerance of standard or sham donations. Physiolo
gic adjustments and the hematopoietic response to reduced red cell mas
s were greater in the 2-unit group, but the donation of 1 unit or 2 un
its did not cause detectable symptoms of reduced oxygen-carrying capac
ity.