N. Clark et al., HIGH-ENERGY BALLISTIC AND AVULSIVE FACIAL INJURIES - CLASSIFICATION, PATTERNS, AND AN ALGORITHM FOR PRIMARY RECONSTRUCTION, Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 98(4), 1996, pp. 583-601
A 17-year experience from 1977 to 1993 with gunshot, shotgun, and high
-energy avulsive facial injuries emphasizes the superiority and safety
of ''ballistic wound'' surgical management: (1) immediate stabilizati
on in anatomic position of existing bone, (2) primary closure of exist
ing soft tissue, (3) periodic ''second look'' serial debridement proce
dures, and (4) definitive early reconstruction of soft-tissue and bony
defects. The series contains 250 gunshot wounds, 53 close-range shotg
un wounds, and 15 high-energy avulsive facial injuries. Four general p
atterns of involvement are noted for both gunshot and shotgun wounds a
nd three for avulsive facial injuries. The treatment algorithm begins
with identifying zones of injury and loss for both soft and hard tissu
e. Gunshot wounds are best classified by the location of the exit woun
d; shotgun and avulsive facial wounds are classified according to the
zone of soft-tissue and bone loss. Treatment, prognosis, and complicat
ions vary according to four patterns of gunshot wounds and four patter
ns of shotgun wounds. Avulsive wounds have not been recommended previo
usly for ballistic wound surgical management. The appropriate manageme
nt of high-energy avulsive and ballistic facial injuries is best appro
ached by an aggressive treatment program emphasizing initial primary r
epair of existing tissue, serial conservative debridement, and early d
efinitive reconstruction. There is an entire category of fractures whi
ch I will eliminate from this study; this is the group of fractures re
sulting from gunshot wounds. These, usually resulting from suicide att
empts, are often veritable explosions of the face without any surgical
interest.