Md. Servetnick et al., LENS INDUCTION IN AXOLOTLS - COMPARISON WITH INDUCTIVE SIGNALING MECHANISMS IN XENOPUS-LAEVIS, The International journal of developmental biology, 40(4), 1996, pp. 755-761
Amphibian lens induction is an embryonic process whose broad outlines
are conserved between anurans and urodeles; however, it has been argue
d that some aspects of this process differ significantly between even
closely related species. Classical embryologists concluded that in som
e species direct contact between the optic vesicle and ectoderm was bo
th necessary and sufficient to induce the ectoderm to form a lens, whi
le in other species tissues other than the optic vesicle induce lens f
ormation. Recent studies of lens induction in Xenopus have argued that
lens induction may be more conserved evolutionarily than was previous
ly thought and that the different conclusions reached in the classical
literature may be due more to experimental methodology than to actual
differences in the process of lens induction. We have tested this hyp
othesis by examining the timing of lens induction in the axolotl and t
he ability of various tissues to induce lenses in explant cultures. We
find that, despite the evolutionary divergence between Xenopus and Am
bystoma, the mechanism of lens specification is substantially similar
in the two species. These results support the hypothesis that the mech
anism of lens induction is evolutionarily conserved among amphibians.