As. Landa et al., A COMPARISON OF THE DETACHMENT OF AN ADHERING ORAL STREPTOCOCCAL STRAIN STIMULATED BY MOUTHRINSES AND A PREBRUSHING RINSE, Biofouling, 9(4), 1996, pp. 327-339
The effects of two mouthrinses, Hibident(R) and Scope(R), and a pre-br
ushing rinse, Plax(R), on the detachment of an oral bacterium adhering
to enamel, with and without a salivary conditioning film, were compar
ed. Furthermore, the influence of the hydrophobicity of the substratum
on the detachment of adhering microorganisms as stimulated by the ora
l rinses was studied. All experiments were carried out in a parallel p
late flow chamber with Streptococcus sobrinus HG 1025 adhering to enam
el, hydrophilic glass and dichlorodimethylsilane-coated, hydrophobic g
lass. Perfusion of the flow chamber with the two mouthrinses did not s
timulate any significant detachment of adhering S. sobrinus HG 1025, w
hereas perfusion with the pre-brushing rinse stimulated up to 100% det
achment. Moreover, the pre-brushing rinse Plax(R) was more effective i
n stimulating bacterial detachment from salivary conditioning films th
an from bare substrata. Plax(R), and possibly to a lesser extent also
Scope(R), weakened the bond between adhering S. sobrinus HG 1025 and t
he substrata, thereby facilitating removal of adhering cells during hi
gh shear, as exerted here by the passage of a liquid-air interface thr
ough the chamber and as occurring in vivo by eating, speaking, drinkin
g or swallowing. It is hypothesized that the controversies over the cl
inical efficacies of Plax(R) may be due to the inability of its, other
wise effective, detergent system to penetrate the plaque and stimulate
detachment of the linking film, i.e. the initially adhering bacteria.