A. Ramzi et al., NON-AFFINE DEFORMATION AND SPATIAL FLUCTUATIONS OF THE MODULUS OBSERVED IN HETEROGENEOUS NETWORKS AND NANOCOMPOSITES, Faraday discussions, (101), 1995, pp. 167-184
The anisotropic small-angle neutron scattering from two different mate
rials is considered. One is a polymer network permeated by free, uncro
ss-linked, deuteriated chains. These free chains behave as mobile spec
ies. The other is made up of two networks, one being deuteriated, grow
n interwoven with each other. They are made of two different polymers
which are immiscible, one being in a soft, rubbery state, the other in
a hard, glassy state. The scattering of the two systems displays an u
nusual dependence upon the direction with respect to the stretching ax
is. The scattered intensity recorded along any direction which corresp
onds to an increase in the dimensions increases strongly with the elon
gation ratio. The isointensity patterns, so-called butterflies, have t
he shape of 8s, oriented along the stretching axis. We propose a gener
al explanation: in both cases this increase is due to the separation b
etween some hard, weakly deformed regions inside a softer matrix. This
implies, for the network permeated by free chains, that a scattering
contrast is created between hard and soft regions: the free chains mig
rate into the soft regions. The increase of the correlation length, xi
, along any extended direction of the sample (such as the one parallel
to the stretching) reveals an intermediate regime at lower and lower
values of the scattering vector, q. In this q range, the intensity, I(
q), is superimposed on a limit curve, characteristic of each sample. T
he perpendicular scattering is essentially unaffected. Different conti
nuous-medium elasticity theories have tried to explain such an anisotr
opy of the spatial fluctuations of concentration. Rather accurate meas
urements allow us to detect disagreements between these theories and e
xperiment. In our opinion, this confirms our more direct picture: the
progressive unscreening of the structure of the spatial distribution o
f the modulus.