THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE DIABETES HEALTH PROFILE (DHP) IN NIDDM PATIENTS REFERRED FOR INSULIN THERAPY

Citation
P. Goddijn et al., THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE DIABETES HEALTH PROFILE (DHP) IN NIDDM PATIENTS REFERRED FOR INSULIN THERAPY, Quality of life research, 5(4), 1996, pp. 433-442
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath",Nursing
Journal title
ISSN journal
09629343
Volume
5
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
433 - 442
Database
ISI
SICI code
0962-9343(1996)5:4<433:TVAROT>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Recently, a new diabetes-specific questionnaire, the Diabetes Health P rofile (DHP), has been developed to identify psychosocial dysfunctioni ng of insulin-requiring (NIDDM) and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitu s (IDDM) patients. The DHP comprises three dimensions: psychological d istress (PSY: 14 items), barriers to activity (BAR: 12 items) and disi nhibited eating (EAT: five items). This study investigates the psychom etric properties of the DHP in Dutch noninsulin-dependent diabetes mel litus (NIDDM) patients referred for insulin therapy. In addition, the relationship between patient characteristics and the DHP outcome was e xamined. The factor structure found was similar but not identical to f ormer studies, but construct validity was supported by high correlatio ns of our factor structure and the original factor outcome and Cronbac h's alpha. The three factors explained 32% of the variance, supporting earlier findings. It was shown that Cronbach's alpha was satisfactory (0.72, 0.72 and 0.79). Convergent validity showed strong and signific ant correlations between the PSY/BAR dimensions and predicted correspo nding scales of the RAND-36. However, the PSY/BAR dimensions also show ed, although less strong, significant correlations with the non-corres ponding RAND-36 scales. The EAT dimension showed only correlations wit h two of the RAND-36 dimensions, thus measuring a different trait. Reg ression analysis showed that older patients had less problems with ite ms of the EAT dimension and that no difference was found between men a nd women, supporting earlier findings. The hyperglycaemic complaint 'f atigue' gave a significantly lower score (more problems) on the PSY an d BAR dimensions. Younger age, the presence of hypertension and retino pathy resulted in a significantly lower score on the EAT dimension. DH P outcome was not significantly influenced by duration of diabetes, Hb A(1c) (indicator of glycemic control), serum total cholesterol, body m ass index, chronic diabetes complications and comorbidity. Overall, th e psychometric properties were good considering the small and diverse sample, suggesting that the DHP is promising for use in NIDDM patients , although more study is necessary in a larger sample.