Ar. Zlotta et al., CLINICAL PROGNOSTIC CRITERIA FOR LATER DIAGNOSIS OF PROSTATE CARCINOMA IN PATIENTS WITH INITIAL ISOLATED PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA, European urology, 30(2), 1996, pp. 249-255
Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is considered as a precursor
of prostate cancer and is frequently associated with it. Diagnosis of
PIN on a prostate needle biopsy without associated carcinoma is a dif
ficult problem since high-grade PIN does not necessarily mean that pro
state cancer is always present and low-grade PIN is associated with ca
ncer as well. Definition of parameters predictive of the later finding
of prostate cancer on repeat biopsy in patients with PIN is of eviden
t interest and we have reviewed our experience and recent data from th
e literature on this topic. High grade is a strong predictor of later
cancer found on repeat biopsy (50-100%) and in these patients, serum p
rostate-specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination and transre
ctal ultrasound are predictors of later cancer found on repeat biopsy.
High-grade PIN is, however, frequently associated with later cancer w
hatever PSA, even when less than or equal to 4 ng/ml. Low-grade PIN se
ems to behave like BPH since the incidence of later cancer is extremel
y low when PSA is <4 ng/ml and is high when PSA >10 ng/ml. Patients wi
th high-grade PIN should systematically be rebiopsied after 3-6 months
to exclude cancer because they are likely to have undiagnosed cancer.
Patients with low-grade PIN and low PSA seem to have a low risk of la
ter cancer found on repeat biopsy. Patients with low-grade PIN and hig
h serum PSA should have repeat biopsies because the incidence of subse
quent cancer is high and comparable to high-grade PIN. Further investi
gations are needed to optimize the management of patients with low-gra
de PIN and intermediate PSA level.