F. Marra et al., AMINOGLYCOSIDE ADMINISTRATION AS A SINGLE DAILY DOSE - AN IMPROVEMENTTO CURRENT PRACTICE OR A REPEAT OF PREVIOUS ERRORS, Drugs, 52(3), 1996, pp. 344-370
Despite the availability of newer and safer antibacterials, aminoglyco
sides continue to play a major role in the management of infections in
hospitalised patients. The concept of single daily dose (SDD) regimen
s was introduced many years ago and is now receiving much attention as
an alternative regimen for this class of drugs. To evaluate the ratio
nale and clinical support for SDD schemes, we conducted a 'MEDLINE' se
arch to locate relevant preclinical and clinical literature pertaining
to this issue. The results of animal model and noncomparative clinica
l data tended to be variable and inconclusive. We were able to identif
y 28 prospective comparative clinical trials; however, only one was ra
ndomised, double-blind and of sufficient sample size to detect differe
nces in efficacy between treatment arms, should any exist. Despite the
se flaws, our review suggests that SDD schemes appear to be no more ef
ficacious and no less toxic, but may be less costly, than traditional
multiple daily dose schemes. We also assessed the predicted dispositio
n of tobramycin/gentamicin in 415 patients with known pharmacokinetic
parameters. With doses of 7 mg/kg at intervals of between 24 and 60 ho
urs (depending upon renal function), the maximum serum concentration a
t steady-state (C-max(ss)) varied from 8.5 to 55.6 mg/L, while the C-m
in(ss) was <2.0 mg/L in the majority of patients. Mid-interval serum a
minoglycoside concentrations were <0.5 mg/L in up to 23% of patients,
suggesting possible underdosage in certain patients with this scheme.
More conclusive clinical evidence is necessary before SDD schemes shou
ld be adopted as standard clinical practice. Empirical weight-based do
sage schemes appear to yield widely variable serum aminoglycoside conc
entrations which could be considered therapeutically inadequate or tox
ic.