A critique is provided of the physical and chemical control of primary
and secondary xylem development in terms of mechanics, genetics, phyl
ogenetics, and the larger field of plant physiology. Strengths and wea
knesses of the phytohormone theory of vascular development are analyze
d. Homeobox genes, sub-cellular phytohormone localization, anatomical
responses to varied phytohormone ratios and dosages, polar auxin trans
port, second messengers, radial fluxes in water potential, intercellul
ar signalling, lignin biochemistry, and the phylogenetic position of b
ryophytes in relation to xylogenesis are identified as some areas for
future research. Homeodomain proteins are addressed in terms of cambia
l initials and cell-fate determination, and other genetic and environm
ental factors controlling differentiation of diverse cellular phenotyp
es are reviewed. As a 'continuum hypothesis', it is proposed that the
extent of secondary wall sculpturing during tracheary element differen
tiation is a function of the duration of homeotic gene expression.