Bu. Marsan et al., THE THROMBOSED PROSTHETIC GRAFT IS A RISK FOR INFECTION OF AN ADJACENT GRAFT, The American journal of surgery, 172(2), 1996, pp. 175-177
BACKGROUND: A bland thrombosed graft may be more susceptible to the fu
ture risk of infection than a patent graft, Once infected, that graft
can threaten other patent grafts, Therefore, the purpose of the follow
ing study was to assess the role a thrombosed graft might play in infe
ction of contiguous patent bypasses. METHODS: From 1990, a retrospecti
ve review was performed using the operative and medical records of cas
es in which a prosthetic graft infection was identified arising in ass
ociation with an adjacent thrombosed graft. RESULTS: A total of 22 cas
es of prosthetic arterial bypass infection were treated at our institu
tion from January 1990 through September 1995. Of these, 7 (32%) were
identified by the operative report as arising in a thrombosed prosthet
ic graft and spreading to an attached or adjacent patent prosthetic gr
aft, All patients had multiple bypasses prior to infection, mean 5.4 /- .75 (range 3 to 8). All thrombosed infected grafts were infrainguin
al polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) for limb salvage: 6 femoralpopliteal
and 1 femorotibial, Mean interval time between placement of the prima
rily infected graft and removal was 14.6 +/- 6.7 months (range 1 to 53
). The secondarily infected patent bypasses were inflow procedures to
the same limb in 6 cases: 1 aortofemoral, 2 ileofemoral, 2 axillofemor
al, and 1 femoral femoral graft. The thrombosed infrainguinal bypass w
as directly attached to the secondarily infected bypass in 5 cases and
near but not attached in 1 case. One secondarily infected prosthetic
graft was a femoraldistal bypass placed adjacent to the thrombosed gra
ft, Four patients had above-knee amputations with a clinically bland g
raft divided at the time of amputation, In these 4 patients and 2 addi
tional cases, wet gangrene or infection was present in the distal extr
emity prior to the development of prosthetic graft infection, At the p
oint that infection became clinically apparent, the thrombosed graft w
as removed in all cases and the secondarily infected graft was removed
in 4 of 7 cases. Overall mortality was 57%. CONCLUSIONS: A thrombosed
prosthetic graft near a patent prosthetic bypass may become secondari
ly infected and threaten the patent graft, We recommend total removal
of any thrombosed prosthetic graft in proximity to a patent prosthetic
bypass when the risk of infection is high or at the time of subsequen
t amputation for gangrene.