Gk. Ogilvie et al., EFFECT OF ANESTHESIA AND SURGERY ON ENERGY-EXPENDITURE DETERMINED BY INDIRECT CALORIMETRY IN DOGS WITH MALIGNANT AND NONMALIGNANT CONDITIONS, American journal of veterinary research, 57(9), 1996, pp. 1321-1326
Objective-To determine energy expenditure (EE) of apparently resting,
client-owned dogs with malignant or nonmalignant diseases that were re
covering from anesthesia and surgery, and compare those values with va
lues from clinically normal, apparently resting, client-owned dogs. An
imals-40 apparently resting, client-owned dogs that had been given gen
eral anesthesia for various elective and nonelective surgical procedur
es, and 30 apparently resting, clinically normal client-owned dogs use
d as controls. Procedure-EE was determined, using an open-flow indirec
t calorimetry system. Each dog was evaluated before and after surgery
(0, 1, 2, and 3 days after surgery, then al suture removal > 14 days l
ater) and compared with apparently resting, clinically normal, client-
owned dogs (n = 30). Parameters evaluated were rate of oxygen consumpt
ion (V-O2/kg of body weight: ml/min/kg; V-O2/kg(0.75): ml/min/kg(0.75)
), EE (EE/kg: kcal/kg/d; EE/kg(0.75): kcal/kg(0.75)/d), and respirator
y quotient. Results-Surgery and anesthesia did not significantly alter
any of these parameters at any time assessed in any group. The pretre
atment V-O2 and EE were significantly lower in the dogs with cancer, c
ompared with dogs of other groups. Conclusions-These data suggest that
the EE of a restricted group of dogs that undergo anesthesia and surg
ery for malignant and nonmalignant conditions does not increase from b
aseline values or when compared with values in clinically normal, clie
nt-owned dogs. Clinical Relevance-This information may be of value whe
n planning nutritional treatment for dogs recovering from anesthesia a
nd surgery.