Jm. Annett et Jc. Leslie, EFFECTS OF VISUAL AND VERBAL INTERFERENCE TASKS ON OLFACTORY MEMORY -THE ROLE OF TASK COMPLEXITY, British journal of psychology, 87, 1996, pp. 447-460
Recent studies have demonstrated that visual and verbal suppression ta
sks interfere with olfactory memory in a manner which is partially con
sistent with a dual coding interpretation. However, it has been sugges
ted that total task complexity rather than modality specificity of the
suppression tasks might account for the observed pattern of results.
This study addressed the issue of whether or not the level of difficul
ty and complexity of suppression tasks could explain the apparent moda
lity effects noted in earlier experiments. A total of 608 participants
were each allocated to one of 19 experimental conditions involving in
terference tasks which varied suppression type (visual or verbal), nat
ure of complexity (single, double or mixed) and level of difficulty (e
asy, optimal or difficult) and presented with 13 target odours. Either
recognition of the odours or free recall of the odour names was teste
d on one occasion, either within 15 minutes of presentation or one wee
k later. Both recognition and recall performance showed an overall eff
ect for suppression nature, suppression level and time of testing with
no effect for suppression type. The results lend only limited support
to Paivio's (1986) dual coding theory, but have a number of character
istics which suggest that an adequate account of olfactory memory may
be broadly similar to current theories of face and object recognition.
All of these phenomena might be dealt with by an appropriately modifi
ed version of dual coding theory.