IDENTIFICATION OF PATIENTS REQUIRING OUTPATIENT FOLLOW-UP AFTER TRANSURETHRAL PROSTATECTOMY - IS THERE A ROLE FOR NURSE-LED SCREENING OF POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES BY TELEPHONE
Rj. Brough et al., IDENTIFICATION OF PATIENTS REQUIRING OUTPATIENT FOLLOW-UP AFTER TRANSURETHRAL PROSTATECTOMY - IS THERE A ROLE FOR NURSE-LED SCREENING OF POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES BY TELEPHONE, British Journal of Urology, 78(3), 1996, pp. 401-404
Objective To determine the most efficient method to follow patients af
ter transurethral prostatectomy (TURF) such that only those patients s
uffering significant post-operative problems are reviewed. Patients an
d methods The study comprised two parts: (1) a retrospective review of
the case notes of 100 consecutive patients who underwent TURF under o
ne consultant to determine whether any factors could be identified pre
- or post-operatively by which those patients most likely to require c
linic review could be selected and; (2) a prospective review of the su
cceeding 100 patients undergoing TURF, using a telephone 'screening' c
all made by the urological research nurse 3 months after the operation
. Patients who requested follow-up and those patients with malignancy
or admitted in high-pressure chronic retention were reviewed in the ou
t-patient department. Results In the first part, 17 patients (17%) req
uired an out-patient review for malignancy. Only nine patients (11%) w
ith benign histology required further treatment after TURP; this subgr
oup could not be identified on the basis of their pre- or post-operati
ve symptoms. In the second part, 23 patients were not reviewed by tele
phone; 14 had carcinoma of the prostate, eight had no telephone and on
e could not be contacted after seven attempts. Of the remaining 77 con
tacted by 'phone, 61 (79%) declined further clinic review and 16 (21%)
requested follow-up for persistent problems. A mean of two calls was
made per patient and the mean duration of each call was 6.3 min. Concl
usions Based on pre- or post-operative symptoms at the time of dischar
ge, there is no reliable method of identifying those patients who have
a poor result after TURF. Telephone screening of patients at 3 months
identified successfully those patients who required an out-patient re
view and enabled resources to be targeted towards this difficult group
of patients.