THE ROLE OF DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION, BIOPSY GLEASON SUM AND PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN SELECTING PATIENTS WHO REQUIRE PELVIC LYMPH-NODE DISSECTIONS FOR PROSTATE-CANCER
E. Rogers et al., THE ROLE OF DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION, BIOPSY GLEASON SUM AND PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN SELECTING PATIENTS WHO REQUIRE PELVIC LYMPH-NODE DISSECTIONS FOR PROSTATE-CANCER, British Journal of Urology, 78(3), 1996, pp. 419-425
Objective To examine the usefulness of clinical stage, tumour differen
tiation and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, alone and in combin
ation, to predict regional nodal metastases in individual patients wit
h localized prostate cancer. Patients and methods The usefulness of di
gital rectal examination (DRE), biopsy Gleason sum and PSA, alone and
in combination, to predict nodal metastases in an individual patient w
as examined. The study included 689 patients who had laparoscopic or o
pen pelvic lymph node dissection for clinical stage T1-3 prostate canc
er. The Kruskal-Wallis test, Mantel-Haenszel test, chi-squared test an
d logistic regression were used for continuous, ordinal, categorical,
and multivariate analysis, respectively. Results Of the 689 patients w
ho underwent radical prostatectomy, 52 (8%) had nodal metastases. Alth
ough clinical stage, DRE, pre-operative PSA level and biopsy Gleason s
um were significantly related in the univariate analysis, only pre-ope
rative PSA level and biopsy Gleason sum were significant predictors of
lymph node status in a multivariate analysis. However, based on a rec
eiver operating characteristic curve, a model with satisfactory sensit
ivity and specificity could not be obtained. Conclusion Current estima
tions of primary prostate cancer biology using pre-operative PSA level
, clinical stage and biopsy Gleason sum are not sufficiently sensitive
to predict nodal metastases, and pelvic lymphadenectomy remains the d
efinitive method of detection.