Hj. Bogaard et al., COMPARISON OF THE RESPIRATORY AND HEMODYNAMIC-RESPONSES OF HEALTHY-SUBJECTS TO EXERCISE IN 3 DIFFERENT PROTOCOLS, Occupational medicine, 46(4), 1996, pp. 293-298
Although the importance of exercise testing has been well established,
standardization of protocols is lacking. In the current study three p
rotocols were compared with respect to respiratory and hemodynamic var
iables at submaximal and peak exercise. Fifteen healthy young men unde
rwent three maximal exercise tests using the following protocols. (I)
an increase of 30 Watt, every three minutes; (II) an increase of 10 Wa
tt, every minute; (III) a continuous load increase of 10 Watt/min. Res
piratory measurements were made oi oxygen uptake (VO2), carbon dioxide
output (VCO2), minute ventilation (V-E) and tidal volume (V-T). Hemod
ynamic measurements were made of EGG, heart rate (HR), blood pressure
and stroke volume (SV). The latter variable was measured by means of e
lectrical impedance cardiography (EIC). There were no differences in m
ean maximum load or peak-VO2 between protocols I, II and III. The cour
se oi SV was similar in all protocols, i.e. an increase of about 30% u
ntil 100 Watt, with a subsequent stabilization until maximum load. All
other hemodynamic measurements were similar in both protocols, too. S
ignificant differences were found in submaximal values of VO2 and VCO2
. There were no differences in other gas-exchange variables at any mom
ent during exercise. With respect to the VO2 max or the hemodynamic re
sponse to exercise, any protocol can be used. For the evaluation of su
bmaximal exercise, the protocol that has been used has to be taken int
o account. Differences at these levels are not related to differences
in hemodynamic response.