Mw. Wichmann et al., IMMUNE FUNCTION IS MORE COMPROMISED AFTER CLOSED BONE-FRACTURE AND HEMORRHAGIC-SHOCK THAN HEMORRHAGE ALONE, Archives of surgery, 131(9), 1996, pp. 995-1000
Objective: To determine whether closed bone fracture in conjunction wi
th hemorrhagic shock compromises immune functions more severely than h
emorrhagic shock alone. Design: In a randomized, controlled trial, clo
sed bone fracture of the right lower leg and/or hemorrhagic shock (mea
n+/-SEM arterial blood pressure, 35+/-5 mm Hg for 90 minutes) were ind
uced in male C3H/HeN mice (weight, 25 g). Animals subjected to hemorrh
age were resuscitated with the shed blood and lactated Ringer solution
. At 72 hours after the experiment, all animals were killed to obtain
whole blood, splenocytes, and splenic and peritoneal. macrophages. Mac
rophage interleukin-l and splenocyte interleukin-2 and interleukin-3 r
elease were determined by bioassay, and splenocyte proliferation was m
easured by tritiated thymidine incorporation. Results: Closed bone fra
cture alone did not affect immune functions 72 hours after the trauma.
Hemorrhagic shock, however, induced a significant depression of splen
ocyte and macrophage functions. Bone fracture followed by hemorrhagic
shock further depressed splenocyte proliferation and splenocyte interl
eukin-2 and interleukin-3 release as well as interleukin-l release. Co
nclusion: Since bone injury coupled with hemorrhagic shock produces mo
re severe depression of immune functions than hemorrhage alone, bone i
njury appears to play a contributory role in further depressing immune
functions in trauma patients who experience major blood loss.