Ma. Lescoelong et al., THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS AND PHYSICIAN PROBLEM-SOLVING - IMPLICATIONS FOR IMPROVING THE PROCESS OF CARE, Medical care, 34(9), 1996, pp. 931-953
OBJECTIVES. Research suggests that physicians will engage in more vigi
lant problem-solving under conditions of resource constraints than und
er conditions of resource slack, Increased vigilance related to physic
ians' clinical strategies enhances care by disposing physicians toward
more optimal care choices. The authors examine whether pressures for
clinical resource constraints encourage increased and sustained vigila
nce in problem-solving among cardiologists treating acute myocardial i
nfarction. METHODS. The physician problem-solving process is reconstru
cted from the medical records of all eligible cases of acute myocardia
l infarction treated by the physician sample set over a 6-year period.
The sample period encompasses phases of both resource slack and resou
rce constraints, The Herfindahl index is used to measure the relative
amount of vigilant problem-solving activity exhibited in each of five
major tactical areas of the physician care strategies in each year of
the study. RESULTS. The results support the hypothesis that resource c
onstraints initially promote a shift to increased vigilance in physici
an problem-solving. Only one of the five major tactical areas, however
, is characterized by sustained vigilance over time. The other areas a
re, instead, associated with a substantial reduction in vigilant activ
ity after the initial peak period. CONCLUSIONS. The results suggest th
at resource constraints do set the stage for improved clinical decisio
n-making. Sustained vigilance, however, appears to apply only to those
portions of the care strategy for which the physician can draw a clea
r link between optimizing clinical activity and reducing resource cons
umption. For those portions of the care strategy for which the physici
an cannot establish a clear link, ongoing pressures to conserve resour
ces results in reduced vigilance and a potential reduction in quality
of clinical decision-making.