EFFECTS OF THE INSECTICIDE DURSBAN(R) 4E (ACTIVE INGREDIENT CHLORPYRIFOS) IN OUTDOOR EXPERIMENTAL DITCHES .1. COMPARISON OF SHORT-TERM TOXICITY BETWEEN THE LABORATORY AND THE FIELD
Rpa. Vanwijngaarden et al., EFFECTS OF THE INSECTICIDE DURSBAN(R) 4E (ACTIVE INGREDIENT CHLORPYRIFOS) IN OUTDOOR EXPERIMENTAL DITCHES .1. COMPARISON OF SHORT-TERM TOXICITY BETWEEN THE LABORATORY AND THE FIELD, Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 15(7), 1996, pp. 1133-1142
Using the insecticide Dursban(R) 4E (active ingredient chlorpyrifos) a
s the test compound, results of laboratory acute single-species toxici
ty tests with indigenous and standard test species were compared with
short-term direct effects in outdoor experimental ditches (mesocosms).
In the mesocosms a regression experiment was performed with nominal i
nitial chlorpyrifos concentrations of 0.1, 0.9, 6, and 44 mu g/L. The
mesocosms were sprayed once. Effects were investigated by sampling mac
roinvertebrates and zooplankton and by doing in situ cage experiments
with several species. Chlorpyrifos concentrations showed highest spati
al and temporal variation within 2 d of treatment. Acute effects were
observed on arthropods only and essentially were manifest on day 0. Sh
ort-term direct effects in the mesocosms could be quantified by a regr
ession method for seven of 120 species. For these species, 48- and 96-
h median effective concentrations (EC50s) ranged from 0.1 to 3.4 mu g/
L and were in the same order of magnitude as their laboratory EC50s. S
usceptibility of the most sensitive standard test species (Daphnia mag
na; 48-h median lethal concentration [LC50], 1 mu g/L) was more or les
s representative of susceptible indigenous species. In the mesocosms e
ffects were negligible at the 0.1-mu g/L treatment level. A safety fac
tor of 0.1 (48-h LC50 of Daphnia magna) may have protected almost all
of the species in the community in the mesocosms against short-term di
rect effects. A safety factor of 0.01 probably protected the most susc
eptible taxa we found (laboratory 96-h EC10 for Gammarus pulex, 0.02 m
u g/L; no-observed-effect concentration for Copepoda, <0.1 mu g/L). Th
e question remains, however, of whether long-term (in)direct effects o
n the populations or the community may occur at the 0.1-mu g/L treatme
nt level.