G. Hedin, A COMPARISON OF METHODS TO DETERMINE WHETHER CLINICAL ISOLATES OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS-EPIDERMIDIS FROM THE SAME PATIENT ARE RELATED, The Journal of hospital infection, 34(1), 1996, pp. 31-42
Staphylococcus epidermidis is a major cause of hospital-acquired infec
tions but also part of the normal skin flora. A common clinical questi
on is whether repeated isolation of S. epidermidis from one patient re
presents the same strain; because if different strains are isolated, t
hey are often thought to be contaminants. In this study, different typ
ing methods were compared to answer this question. Twenty isolates of
S. epidermidis from five different patients were investigated. The iso
lates from each patient had identical or very similar antibiograms, an
d were recovered on different occasions. Typing was performed by antib
iogram, biotype, slime production, plasmid profile, and pulsed-field g
el electrophoresis (PFGE) banding pattern of SmaI digests of chromosom
al DNA. In addition, the level of resistance to methicillin was determ
ined by growth curves in broth containing methicillin for a series of
different inocula for each isolate. The results showed that the isolat
es from each patient belonged to the same clone, but examples of insta
bilities in their antibiograms, plasmid profiles, as well as their PFG
E banding patterns were seen. A change in the level of methicillin res
istance was observed in one strain; otherwise this characteristic was
found to be strain-specific and stable in vice. It was concluded that
in combination with biotyping and antibiotic resistance testing the le
vel of resistance to methicillin could be used as an aid to distinguis
h between two or more clinical isolates of S. epidermidis from the sam
e patient.