Elucidation of the principal mechanism that underlies premature capaci
ty loss (PCL) in lead/acid positive plates has always been hampered by
the notion that different forms of PCL are responsible for severe and
mild instances of capacity loss. Recently, though, studies focused on
the conductivity of the porous mass have provided a clear, universal
explanation for all examples of PCL. The evidence required to link the
differing views has come from charge/discharge cycling of specially d
esigned plates in which expansion of positive material can be restrict
ed in a controlled fashion. In particular, two findings have bridged t
he gap between failure at the interface (PCL-1) and failure in the bul
k material (PCL-2): (i) plates subjected to extreme conditions of serv
ice can cycle at constant capacity for long periods, despite the prese
nce of 'barrier-layers'; (ii) loss of conductivity in the porous mater
ial close to the current-collector can explain severe and rapid capaci
ty loss. On examination, the latter situation is characterized by a lo
calization of lead sulfate in the region close to the current-collecto
r, in line with previous reports of 'preferential discharge'. The capa
city loss for any plate/cell configuration can now be placed on a cont
inuous scale - the rate of loss is determined by the degree to which t
he configuration, and conditions of service, are able to control the d
ecrease in conductivity of positive material close to the current-coll
ector. Development of positive plates for advanced lead/acid batteries
must consider strategies for maintaining conductivity through managem
ent of the combined effects of expansion and redistribution of positiv
e material.