RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF NEEDLE COLPOSUSPENSION VERSUS ENDOPELVIC FASCIA PLICATION FOR POTENTIAL STRESS-INCONTINENCE PROPHYLAXIS IN WOMEN UNDERGOING VAGINAL RECONSTRUCTION FOR STAGE-III OR STAGE-IVPELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE
Rc. Bump et al., RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF NEEDLE COLPOSUSPENSION VERSUS ENDOPELVIC FASCIA PLICATION FOR POTENTIAL STRESS-INCONTINENCE PROPHYLAXIS IN WOMEN UNDERGOING VAGINAL RECONSTRUCTION FOR STAGE-III OR STAGE-IVPELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 175(2), 1996, pp. 326-333
OBJECTIVE: Severe prolapse may mask potential genuine stress urinary i
ncontinence in women. Some have suggested that a suspending urethropex
y be performed in women who have potential genuine stress incontinence
demonstrated by barrier reduction of the prolapse preoperatively. Our
aim waste compare outcomes after prolapse surgery that included a nor
mal bladder neck suspension with those operations that did not. STUDY
DESIGN: This prospective randomized clinical trial assigned 32 women w
ith bladder neck hypermobility and stage III or IV pelvic organ prolap
se to receive either a needle colposuspension or bladder neck endopelv
ic fascia plication as part of the vaginal reconstructive surgery. Twe
nty-nine subjects underwent detailed clinical, anatomic, urodynamic, a
nd quality-of-life evaluations before and 6 weeks and 6 months after s
urgery; 23 completed urinary diary and quality-of-life evaluations aft
er a mean of 2.9 years. RESULTS: Needle colposuspension increased shor
t-term complications without providing additional protection from de n
ovo stress incontinence. Barrier testing before surgery predicted uret
hral sphincteric resistance after surgery; however, such testing neith
er predicted a patient's function after surgery nor indicated the need
for a suspending urethropexy. The combination of a needle colposuspen
sion with a sacrospinous ligament suspension predisposed to the early
development of support defects of the upper anterior vaginal segment a
nd to failure of bladder neck support. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative barri
er testing in women with severe prolapse is not useful in identifying
individuals who require a suspending urethropexy. Needle colposuspensi
on increases short-term complications, lacks durability, and may predi
spose to early and severe recurrent anterior prolapse when performed w
ith a sacrospinous ligament vault suspension.